Does sidenotes work on mac Patch#
Does sidenotes work on mac professional#

My interest in APub is primarily for producing long documents, so right now I too simply cannot use it.īut I love what they are doing, I support them 100%, and I am rooting for them. Hopefully that will accelerate the introduction of needed/required features. So I assume they are getting firsthand experience with the issues faced by users who produce long documents such as books.

It is my understanding that Affinity is producing the Affinity Publisher Workbook using Publisher. Sadly, I'm afraid that's what we have in AF Publisher at this point. If something in programming didn't work, rather than redo it correctly, you would 'hang a bag on it' making a technological griffin, which was a kluge. I'm old enough to remember the term 'kluge' as applied to computing. Most are irrelevant since digital print publishing is mostly PDF-oriented these days. Book creators need mobi and epub in addition to PDF, not all those legacy formats from their image software.

Does sidenotes work on mac Patch#

Also, it's silly to just patch on the export module from Designer and Photo. They would not be able to do it with any efficiency. One with a TOC, illustrations, footnotes, and bibliography. My advice is that Affinity management tries to produce a 250-350 page book using it.

Does sidenotes work on mac professional#

After all, AF Designer and Photo are cheap but they are world-class professional tools. I don't think the fact that that Publisher is cheap should be any excuse for it having key weaknesses, as you describe. Publisher is best suited for an office secretary doing flyers and, IMO, is not equal in functionality as AF Design and Photo. Sadly, it's not a professional tool like Designer and Photo. But I bought a copy of AF Publisher a few weeks ago since I thought it would be ready for publishing primetime by now. I downloaded a beta version of it last year and saw it was not ready. I've been thrilled with owning both AF Designer and AF Photo and had high expectations for AF Publisher. I started with Quark and moved to InDesign many years ago.

Sadly, AF Publisher does not meet a professional standard. You are not just complaining, but are talking about very real issues for those of us interested in publishing books.

Yes, ernie-f I'd say you are right on target. This just sounds like an InDesign fan bad mouthing another product. It took Adobe with profits in the billions and an unlimited access to programmers and developers in their budget years to get InDesign to the same level that Publisher has already achieved.Ĭonstructive criticism is helpful, and positive. That's not to say that we shouldn't have high expectations but we should cut our cloth etc. You say you test Publisher from time to time but it was launched less than 6 months ago at a price level less than 10% that of Indesign or Quark Express. Publisher is extremely fast and makes InDesign look like a snail in comparison. What do you want from a Book function? As for speed - I'm at a loss. Footnotes - well I understand that's on the horizon but many designers I know that use InDesign don't use the footnote function at all and prefer to create them manually, but that's not a reason for the function not to be in Publisher. It would be more helpful if you explained what is wrong with the widow and orphan function.